The free market is the great alibi of power.
The money is his basic tool.
work his weapon of blackmail. The answer is to create alternative circuits and self-managed
We are under siege in recent decades much more than each of us, private citizens all'establishment foreign economic and political, is subjected to a systematic attack that undermines the very foundations of his life in contemporary society. The summary could be called "Marchionne's strategy, except that in this way you may download a single entity, and on an individual company, the responsibility of a phenomenon far more comprehensive and consistent. Strictly speaking, indeed, it is even wrong to talk of phenomenon in the sense of something that manifests itself in reality but whose names are yet to be investigated.
In this case, we face the first tangible results, and unambiguous, a design that not only much larger in size but mainly based on the logic states so unshakable: the use of employees as supreme weapon of blackmail, and then the enslavement, against the population.
The reasoning is elementary. Yet it deserves to be spelled out, so be sure to share it. The only thing which can not give up today is a source of income that would at least cover the basic needs; and that source of income that can not be, in most cases, their work, usually in the service of others. What should be a right inherent to their status as citizens and natural aspiration to become part of the community you belong to, turns into a kind of privilege, which will be granted only to those who will try to earn it.
and not so much not only for his professional contribution, as for its total submission to the employer. And, by extension, the interests and dictates of the dictators that are still higher.
Apparently you subscribe to an employment contract. In fact it makes a pledge of allegiance. The subject bows to the Lord. The Lord, His goodness, allows him to serve.
addition to the basic reasoning is ruthless, but only the naive may surprise: according to traditional precepts dell'iperliberismo, who does not hesitate to sacrifice any principle of ethics to the achievement of maximum profit, the living conditions of people will be considered only by the impact of causing the economic processes. Individuals, so to speak, are a necessary evil.
whose existence is justified only under certain operational requirements of the cycle of production and consumption. A course that requires them to some extent, but at the same time transcends them.
The other, to put it in technical terms, is a "use value". And being seen as parts of a mechanism, rather than as human beings to be respected as such, and to help develop their skills better, the further consequence is that they are substantially interchangeable.
From which it follows, among other things, the absolute ease with which they carry out the relocation: the entrepreneur who move plants abroad is not at all interested in the damage to be suffered by his countrymen, but only that the business benefit him may arise. In a nation worthy of the name would be prosecuted for antisocial conduct, or at least, private of citizenship in fake nations of today it is considered quite normal and even, as evidenced by its recent history of the Fiat, it raises some questions on how to convince him to reserve some 'work to his countrymen.
A true paradox: at the same time when relations become rigid one-way, dismantling the collective agreements and minimizing regulatory safeguards (up to challenge the delicate and essential area of \u200b\u200bsicurezza1), the abuse of power wearing the mask generosity. Not only removes the idea of \u200b\u200bexploitation, but is reversed into the exact opposite. The owner is a benefactor. The worker is your benefit. The salary is a middle ground between the fee due and regalia, provided by someone at the bottom, and at any time, you may decide to sbaraccare everything and go somewhere. A "benefit" from someone else.
who sells and who buys
In Western societies it is more difficult to realize, since the dynamics are fragmented to the point that not everyone can grasp the intimate interconnection, but good to see something very similar happens in what he told John Steinbeck in Grapes of Wrath. Forced to leave Oklahoma in the Great Depression, the Joad family ends up in California and began working for local landowners. Who, not content to pay starvation wages and labor supply on the huge mirror as well, think to complete the work by inducing the workers to stay on their land, of course, four cabins in money and supplies from a store also located in vicinity of cultivated fields, and looks a bit ', owned by the same landlords.
A vicious circle in its own way perfect. The work is underpaid, food and everything else is expensive. Opportunities for profit doubled. First we derive profit from the pay, or on what you buy, then prices of the goods, or on what you sell. The poor remain poor is because they earn little, and because spends too much. The poor are trapped. If it is not subject to slavery lost livelihoods. If bows his head survives, provided that the hardship is not the breaks, but no longer has any choice. So no autonomy.
change what needs to be changed, the current situation is similar. The average citizen is squeezed for the first time in the workplace, and a second when they must provide the goods and services, including any bank financing, you'll need. Or they believe they need, as a result of that additional form of manipulation and subjugation which consists of the induced needs. In other words, he is the victim of a sort of compulsory mediation. It's like taking the owner of the flour mill and then buy bread from him. Too bad that the flour has been forced to sell it cheap, and the bread it pays its weight in gold. This forced
brokerage, which is never spoken and that still would be explained as the natural outcome of free enterprise and the consequent division of roles, implies the loss of any control on the overall organization. And, therefore, the loss of any opportunity to escape the inequalities that stem from it. Not only weakens us, in the endless effort to get away and, at best, to climb a rung on the ladder of wealth. What's worse, you will help make stronger and stronger the oligarchs who pull the strings, becoming de facto supporters, the able performers, even involuntary accomplices but just as reliable.
The way out
It is still an operational project, if not a little. It is not because, to be put into practice and begin to have effect, requires a much higher number of people than those who read regularly and share the Rebel instances. In addition, each of the various groups should be concentrated in one area, so that members can interact with each other in a regular and systematic basis. Creating thus a network of economic relations - even business schools - which tend to self-sufficiency.
If this is the ultimate goal, which is well set to learn more where you are going to delude ourselves that we can complete the course, some steps you can move immediately. Or at least be ready to do it, as if you were preparing for a journey (migration), which will begin as soon as conditions permit.
Just like a trip, then, the first acts to be done about foreplay. One, carefully study the maps. Two, plan the logistics. Three, last but not least, to prepare themselves mentally to face what lies ahead, imagining the difficulties that will meet and possible solutions.
Metaphors aside, the maps are those of the economic environment at both macro and micro levels. Logistics covers the material resources and people we can count on. The purpose of the trip is out of the vicious circle mentioned above: instead of placing all our economic acts in the existing circuits, paying their pledge to structural inequalities, the alternative circuits to be created, based on other principles and aimed to other results, in contrast to the speculations of large and small vessels which are now the rule in any business. A first hypothesis to start from something that only depend on us, is to remedy the lack of money free services with each other. v Of course, not in a logic of "one" who otherwise would only play the same utilitarian approach of the normal business transactions, but from a perspective of selfless support and friendly as the real engine is solidarity. Or, rather, the pleasure typical of the gratuity, to do things together for the sake of it. Need a hand? If I can do thee. If and when the positions were to be upset I hope you can do the same. Not to save on the expenditure that should I take to gain the cooperation of a stranger, but to continue to transform the lives watchful dell'ometto liberal generous man in life free.
To many it may seem a mere utopia, but it is only because they are so imbued with a vision economistic impossible to find what should be normal. And that ultimately survives, even if confined to increasingly narrow dimension of friendship relations. Or family if the family has kept something healthy.
Conversely, this type of momentum should be recovered not only in the sphere of leisure but also in the work. The truth is, if anything, you have forgotten, is simple and rewarding of loyal people, and not clouded by the desire to earn more money and develop your career at any cost, it works better. We speak frankly. You get rid of that the background of competition and antagonism that poisons so many work environments, causing everyone to watch and share only the bare essentials, fearing that the "colleagues" if they fit improperly.
is a bit 'as with the decline: it is becoming a necessity, but should be first choice. Retrieve different forms of economic organization, as the real and true cooperative savings banks, is increasingly required a response in times of rising unemployment and speculative finance. But it should be totally free statement, worthy of one who rebels against the current system because it is excluded from certain privileges but those privileges because they refused. It's not just that he finds them unfair and wrong then. You do not know what to do.
Notes:
1) On August 25, 2010 Minister Tremonti said that "stuff like the 626 (the law on safety at work) are a luxury we can not afford. Italy are the European Union that must adapt to the world. " Later it is safe to say that his real target was the mold and excessive bureaucratic controls, and safety at work is "an essential achievement of Western civilization."
Source: www.ariannaeditrice.it
